Quantcast
You are not logged in, click here to log in.
91 Replies Last post: Nov 18, 2006 1:32 PM by tjustin7   1 2 3 ... 7 Previous Next
Click to view Macworld.com's profile Enthusiast 1,900 posts since
Feb 6, 2004
Reply

May 16, 2006 1:30 PM

Editors' Notes Weblog: Price points

Apple's newly unveiled MacBook offers a lot of features. A sub-$1,000 price tag isn't one of them. more
Reply
Click to view veggiedude's profile Member 416 posts since
Aug 30, 2004
1. May 16, 2006 1:40 PM in response to: Macworld.com
Re: Editors' Notes Weblog: Price points
True, you can get a PC laptop for $500, but now Apple has a MacBook at $1100, which is TWO machines in one. Mac and PC. That levels the playing field.

Click to view dainius's profile New Member 9 posts since
Jan 18, 2006
2. May 16, 2006 1:51 PM in response to: Macworld.com
Re: Editors' Notes Weblog: Price points
This comment is built on the premise, that apple is trying to offer cheap alternative to pc laptop. I doubt that. Mac laptop is in itself, something not very cheap, middle market.
Click to view Jamus's profile New Member 115 posts since
Aug 27, 2004
3. May 16, 2006 2:10 PM in response to: Macworld.com
Re: Editors' Notes Weblog: Price points
The sub-$1K models really shine when you have someone who already has a good desktop machine but they need something mobile to take with them on the road or out to a client office. You don't want to spend more for a only-used-sometimes notebook than you spent on your main workhorse desktop. For that situation you do not need the latest and greatest (nor the glossiest screen???). Just a good dependable INEXPENSIVE laptop, oops "notebook".
Click to view Grapho's profile Enthusiast 1,223 posts since
Aug 30, 2004
4. May 16, 2006 2:10 PM in response to: Macworld.com
Re: Editors' Notes Weblog: Price points
If you want mobility and you want OS X then you only have one choice. Apple knows this and that is way they charge what they charge. They could come in with a Mac with no iSight and probably a single core processor, but then you wont really get the multithreaded experience that Apple is trying to offer through their very responsive OS. I just finished working on my coworkers Mac which is a single processor G4 400 MHz, they I came back to my dual core G5, the experience is undeniably batter on the newer faster hardware. Besides iLife is getting more ambitions with each release, so again the more robust the specks the better the experience. Isn't the experience really what makes a Mac a Mac?
Click to view tomtom's profile Member 886 posts since
Jan 6, 2006
5. May 16, 2006 2:13 PM in response to: Jamus
Spot on!
I agree 100% from my point of view. However. I have seen kids trying to do homework on poor Windows laptops and in the middle of a MS Word document - a freeze. My neighbors have called me out in earnest when this happens and of course there is nothing I can do. So, at the expense of we e-mail and read documents only folks, perhaps the Apple has chosen the right course.
Click to view jmincey's profile Old Hand 3,934 posts since
Aug 27, 2004
6. May 16, 2006 2:19 PM in response to: Macworld.com
Re: Editors' Notes Weblog: Price points
It's good to see I'm not the only one who finds that while Apple may be charging a reasonable price for the products it DOES offer, that doesn't mean there are not still significant holes in its product line -- and these holes remain glaring at the low-end of the consumer level. In recent weeks I have cited the low-end desktop niche which Apple haspreviously (and successfully) served, and now it appears that we can add a low-end notebook niche to the list as well.

It IS possible to develop a high-quality product for this niche without requiring that Apple out-Dell Dell at its own game. I don't expect Apple will become a de facto assembler with ultra low margins. Nor do I advocate that. But it IS possible for Apple to provide a viable (and profitable) desktop consumer model at $799-$999 and a viable (and profitable) notebook consumer model at $899-$999. How do I know this?

Because Apple has done it before.

There's gold in them thar hills and Apple should not ignore this market at the very moment that the Windows OS can be run on Macs.
Click to view schoonerman's profile Member 274 posts since
Oct 16, 2004
7. May 16, 2006 2:22 PM in response to: Macworld.com
Re: Editors' Notes Weblog: Price points
The old $999 was not "under $1000" unless you live in a no-sales-tax state (or buy online and conveniently forget the fact that your state wants you to pay tax even though the vendor doesn't collect it). For me, it would have been $1085 or so.

Keep in mind that Apple has the sales figures for the old low end iBook (and has a pretty good idea what people added on). They have an idea how important the $1000 barrier is. Or isn't.

With my old (1999) IBM laptop reminding me again today that it is near death today's announcement is tempting. Perhaps tempting enough for me to visit the Apple store in the rain Saturday.

--John
Click to view pdrayton's profile Enthusiast 1,820 posts since
Sep 19, 2003
8. May 16, 2006 2:26 PM in response to: Macworld.com
Re: Editors' Notes Weblog: Price points
Apple has a pretty good track record over the past years of nailing it on the price.

Over and over again people complain that Apple is going to miss out because it's pricing is too high.

Some things never change.
Click to view OM18V's profile New Member 1 posts since
May 16, 2006
9. May 16, 2006 2:27 PM in response to: Macworld.com
Re: Editors' Notes Weblog: Price points
Does anyone give any credence to MOSR's contention that the MacBook is actually the "midrange" line, and that the iBook name will be used for a low-end, $799 laptop based around the Core Solo?
Click to view griffman's profile Macworld Editorial 8,043 posts since
Jan 9, 2001
10. May 16, 2006 2:31 PM in response to: pdrayton
Re: Editors' Notes Weblog: Price points
One other minor change (I think it's a change) adds $38 to the price: the DVI/DVI and DVI/VGA adapters are no longer included -- they were with our G3/500 iBook. Now they're $19 each...

-rob.
Click to view rwagoner's profile New Member 13 posts since
Aug 3, 2001
11. May 16, 2006 2:34 PM in response to: Macworld.com
Re: Editors' Notes Weblog: Price points
Actually, what I miss most is the 12 inch size: exactly the size of an actual standard notebook. Granted the new one isn't much bigger, but the 12 inch was amazingly perfect for me as a teacher having to carry things to different rooms.

Richard
Click to view Philip Michaels's profile Macworld Editorial 782 posts since
Dec 14, 2000
12. May 16, 2006 2:37 PM in response to: pdrayton
Re: Editors' Notes Weblog: Price points
In reply to:<hr />
Apple has a pretty good track record over the past years of nailing it on the price.

<hr />


Didn't I say exactly that in the Weblog entry?

Apples been in business for 30 years, and, during that time, its gotten pretty good at figuring out what price the market is willing to bear.
Click to view macFanDave's profile Member 578 posts since
Mar 4, 2004
13. May 16, 2006 2:43 PM in response to: rwagoner
Re: Editors' Notes Weblog: Price points
I thought you were going to talk about the $150 blackness.

There are only two differences between the $1299 MB and the $1499 one. 20GB of more HD space and the black color. At the Apple Store, to upgrade from 60 GB to 80 costs $50, thus the black color represents the rest of the difference.

Weird, huh?
Click to view drdreric's profile New Member 171 posts since
Mar 3, 2004
14. May 16, 2006 2:56 PM in response to: Macworld.com
Hear Hear!
I have been on school district tech committees and in the past been able to silence the Dell is cheaper cries from the microsoft parents. A quick online comparison showed equivalent laptops were $150 less from Apple. But I will have a hard time saying an iSight is necessary for school laptops.

Gotta have a spec'ed down browser and office-type apps platform for the schools.

GOT TO!!

Go to original post 1 2 3 ... 7 Previous Next