Quantcast
You are not logged in, click here to log in.
7 Replies Last post: Feb 18, 2007 10:47 AM by zonetuke  
Click to view MW Forums's profile New Member 12,220 posts since
Aug 2, 2004
Reply

Dec 26, 2006 9:00 AM

Data Backup 2.1

Other than the weak support for optical discs and a below-average synchronization feature—neither of which is crucial for backing up your data to hard drives—there’s little not to like about Data Backup 2.1. more
Reply
Click to view slather's profile New Member 27 posts since
Dec 26, 2006
1. Dec 26, 2006 11:37 PM in response to: MW Forums
Used to be so much better
I like DataBackup. I use it every day. However, the versions prior to 2.0 were so much better. I have my docket folder set up for automatic versioned backups. In the past, management of the old file versions was far simpler. Now, all old file versions are contained in invisible folders. IIRC, there used to be an excellent management system for existing backed-up files.

The underlying engine was completely replaced between version 1.x and 2.0, and half of the features disappeared. Who drops features when the version number increases?

Anyways, it's still a decent program, but it hardly deserves 4.5 mice when compared to the power, flexibility, and ease of use of the old version. I should have backed up my original 1.x installer!
Click to view kitm's profile New Member 14 posts since
May 21, 2004
2. Dec 27, 2006 1:11 AM in response to: MW Forums
Re: Data Backup 2.1
I bought Data Backup 2.1 at MacWorld a year ago. I tried for months working with Prosoft support trying to get it to work reliably. Finally after they no longer answered my emails I gave up. They told me at MacWorld that they were coming out with a new version (3.0, I think) that would addess the shortcomings I noticed at the time (forget what-too long ago). Never came out. I went back to Tri-Backup.
Click to view jaynelson's profile New Member 10 posts since
Sep 14, 2005
3. Jan 2, 2007 8:21 PM in response to: MW Forums
Re: Data Backup 2.1
I've been using Data Backup 2.1 for several months. While the "Versioned" option appeared to be exactly what I wanted, after a few weeks I checked to see how the backups had been progressing, only to discover that they had stopped. The Log file indicated that my backup hard drive had become full several backups ago. No warning, no dialog, no nothing.

It gets worse: I realized that Data Backup was keeping every Version instead of deleting the oldest ones when it needed more backup space. So, I used Data Backup's tool to manually remove the oldest Versions, and then set Data Backup's preferences to keep only the four most recent Versions.

Today I looked at the Version list, and there are five -- even though I set the preference to four.

Now I'm worried about what will happen when the next couple of backups happen and the hard drive gets full again. At the moment, I'm not very happy with Data Backup.
Click to view kerryd's profile New Member 100 posts since
Feb 12, 2006
4. Jan 6, 2007 10:55 PM in response to: MW Forums
Re: Data Backup 2.1
I trialed Data Backup 2.1 based on your review but was sorely disappointed. It suddenly chewed up half of my 1.5 gigs of memory. Went from 450 megs of use to over 900 megs of use. I quickly went straight back to Retrospect which I've been happily using for 3.5 years. I would agree with you that Retrospect is a bit difficult to comprehend but it works extremely well and has saved my bacon more than once.
Click to view slather's profile New Member 27 posts since
Dec 26, 2006
5. Jan 7, 2007 3:54 AM in response to: jaynelson
Re: Data Backup 2.1
What is up with DataBackup's versioning? It used to work. I've just checked my "versioned" Dockets folder, and I see that DataBackup isn't keeping any versions other than the current one. Sheesh. I can't wait until Leopard -- then I'm ditching this crap in favour of Time Machine.
Click to view Arno_Wouters's profile New Member 2 posts since
Sep 9, 2006
6. Feb 9, 2007 5:42 PM in response to: MW Forums
Re: Data Backup 2.1
I found a coupon for a 50% discount for Data Backup in Joe Kissell's Take Control of Mac OS X Backups and bought it without trying (the link in the Take Control volume does not mention the possibility of a free trial). I am very disappointed and do not understand why it got 4.5 mice. I would give it no more than two! I do not use it anymore and the $30 I payed are wasted. I intended to use Data Backup for daily versioned backups of my home folder to my external hard disk, but it does not work for me. A minor problem is the lack of an option to edit saved sets. More serious is the lack of the possibility to let the program shut down my computer after a backup. What's really bad: I scheduled an interval backup every day, but instead of starting the backup after a day as soon as I boot the computer, it schedules a fixed time every day for backing up -- if the computer is off at that time there is no backup and I don't get any warning about that. What settled it was a failed attempt to restore a folder. I have compression enabled and Data Backup 'restored' the files in compressed form! The user guide does not say anything about restoring files.
Click to view zonetuke's profile New Member 3 posts since
Oct 2, 2001
7. Feb 18, 2007 10:47 AM in response to: Arno_Wouters
Re: Data Backup 2.1
i've tried several backup programs and have always liked Deja Vu from http://propagandaprod.com/. I prefer incremental/mirrored backups. Hasn't failed me yet.

matthew