This Question is Answered
1 "correct" answer available (4 pts) 2 "helpful" answers available (2 pts)
6 Replies
Last post:
May 5, 2008 9:42 PM by
jpp_zoso
When you're done with a file in Pages, Keynote, or Numbers, you just go to File: Export and choose the appropriate Office format to save out as and then send it off. We talk about this compatibility in the reviews of the iWork '08 products that we link to from the story. And Apple has touted this ability and talks about it on its Web site.
Buy whichever suite you think is best for you, but don't make the decision out of spite...
Jon Seff - Senior News Editor, Macworld
Buy whichever suite you think is best for you, but don't make the decision out of spite...
Jon Seff - Senior News Editor, Macworld
I think you're missing the point. I can read that on apple.com, too. But I wanted someone to prove it through some lab testing. There are lots of claims out there, but all are marketing without proof. I read through lots of posts on several sites and there are reports of issues in significant enough numbers to become skeptical about the "ease of compatibility" claim. I just think you guys missed the boat on this one. Perhaps you can do more extensive testing and post your results on this site. It's too late for me, but I assume others would be interested. My new copy of MS Office for Mac is already bought installed. I'll re-hash this in a 2-3 years when it's time to replace my MacBook.
ms office binary/ms office xml file compatibility claims are about as good as autocad drawing compatibility claims...there is no such thing as 100% fidelity. the more complex the file or drawing, meaning the more types of objects used and the more types of formatting styles used, the further from compatible the end translation winds up. when the creator/owner of the file spec can't even guarantee nor produce 100% fidelity between versions, there's no way a 3rd party vendor can either. the closest i've seen to true fidelity maintained using different applications to create and edit a file back and forth is the open document file format. using openoffice/neooffice/staroffice/koffice on some fairly complex (+tables, images, columns, sections, header/footer switches, page orientation switches, page size switches+) word processing documents as a test, only found a few minor hiccups w/ display issues...printing was identical. never tried spreadsheets or presentations.
i'm using ms office 2003, 2007, and 2008 at work...strange things happen w/ formatting when editing among the platforms and versions. binary or xml makes no difference. the bulk of the documents we use retain maybe 75% fidelity when opening w/ pages. spreadsheets maybe 50%. have not tried any presentation files yet.
here's a question i'd like to see answered...why does iwork need to export the files to create the ms office xml files? iwork can open the xml files directly...why can't it save them as well?
- PCW Network
- MacUser
- Mac OS X Hints
- iPhone Central
- PC World
- PCW Business Center
- About Macworld
- Advertise
- Macworld Expo
- MacMania
- Terms of Service Agreement
- Privacy Policy
© Jive Software


