Re: Interest in Psystar shows market for gaming Mac
This would require a 180 degree turnaround in Apple's thinking, which I just don't see happening. It would require Apple to stop being the gatekeeper for graphics drivers and to turn that over to vendors, which is how it works in the Windows marketplace.
All this time I have been getting on the graphics card vendors about not making their cards cross-platform and you never chimed in and brought this point up? Tsk, tsk, Peter.
But, if this is the case, then Apple
is partly to blame for the lack of graphics cards available for Macs. While I no means have any interest in gaming, let alone Apple specifically selling gaming rigs—I personally believe that gaming consoles for that bill quite nicely—Apple does need to seriously reconsider the way it handles the pro market. One of the things that those people that (actually) need and expandable system want is the ability to update their GPU over the life of their computer, but as of now the market for after market Mac-compatible graphics cards is less than slim pickings.
For whatever reason Apple seems to want to refuse to recognize that 1) not all pro users need a full-sized tower (and a non-expandable iMac is not going to suit their needs either) and 2) that they actually need after market cards that they can add to their (expandable) Mac.
“Cannot run out of time. There is infinite time. You are finite. Zathras is finite. This is wrong tool.”
2.3GHz Power Mac G5/4GB/500GB HDD/OS X 10.4.11/30-inch ACD,
60GB iPod (Color)