Re: Interest in Psystar shows market for gaming Mac
I realize that the focus of this article was on hobbyist gamers, but...
1. I understand that the underground hobbyists in the late 70s-early 80s were the ones who initially swarmed to the Apple I and II.
2. Since then Apple has largely turned its back to the hobbyist/DIY crowd and the formerly starched-collar PC world was the one that opened itself up to them.
The DIY market may be small, but why should Apple ignore it? Some solutions:
1. Apple could sell a TPM as a PCI card or custom USB stick or something.
2. Apple could sell a version of OS X that could be installed on non-Apple hardware and charge a premium for it.
3. Apple could unlock standard OS X for hobbyists who are also coders in exchange for a certain amount of their coding or something, barter-style.
4. Something like the iPhone, Apple could demand a share of the sale of Maclones (my term) from small manufacturers.
5. Apple could sell, license, or approve (for a fee) motherboards or chipsets, something like the CHRP (Common Hardware Reference Platform) effort that was killed off in the 90s.
I understand Apple wants to protect their hardware turf. But I think it could open itself up to hobbyists who want to tinker or small shops who know a niche market and want to build (hardware) for it.
Another advantage for Apple opening up the hardware side of things would be to break down a common IT complaint, that of locking themselves in to only one hardware vendor. (I realize that addressing the enterprise moves away from basement hobbyist idea, but...)
Anyway, my 2¢.