Quantcast
You are not logged in, click here to log in.
4 Replies Last post: Dec 4, 2008 8:53 AM by nants  
Click to view Macworld's profile News & Columns Bot 11,211 posts since
Nov 30, 2007
Reply

Dec 2, 2008 9:40 AM

Save time with OS X services

Post your comments for Save time with OS X services here
Reply
Click to view Schneb's profile Old Hand 1,727 posts since
Dec 10, 2002
1. Dec 2, 2008 10:17 AM in response to: Macworld
Re: Save time with OS X services
Apple does not seem to do much usability testing. The reason why people do not use Services is because it was never consistent. Many services, for years, were grayed out, and many of the current services (as can be seen in your screenshot) are buried 3 deep in the menu heirarchal structure. This is also the mistake they made with Automator. It too is buried too deep in the structure.
Click to view mattack's profile New Member 4 posts since
Nov 24, 2008
2. Dec 2, 2008 2:16 PM in response to: Macworld
Re: Save time with OS X services
That is WRONG. Carbon apps can use Services just as well as Cocoa apps.
Click to view mattack's profile New Member 4 posts since
Nov 24, 2008
3. Dec 2, 2008 2:16 PM in response to: mattack
Re: Save time with OS X services
In other words, it is possible. Word for example has lots of hardcoded custom code.
Click to view nants's profile New Member 20 posts since
Feb 18, 2004
4. Dec 4, 2008 8:57 AM in response to: Macworld
Re: Save time with OS X services
Also WRONG: My up-to-date Leopard system has no Library/Services folder at user level, and the one at root level contains few entries, none that would account for 3rd party services.